db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rick Hillegas <Richard.Hille...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Q: Should Derby 10.3 be Derby 11?
Date Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:04:58 GMT
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
> Rick Hillegas wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Dan. I have updated the wiki page to clarify that the 
>> restrictions depend on authentication.
>
> Thanks, two more questions:
>
> In the first table there is the phrase "Among other side-effects"
> What are these side effects, as it is it doesn't really help anyone 
> make a judgment call as to if they will be effected or not?
>
> In the first table there are the phrases "instrument her code" and
> "instrument the rest of her application". I don't know what 
> "instrument" means here, could you expand on what such a user would 
> need to do?
>
> I update the sections a little to be clear on if authentication was 
> system or database, feel free to modify if what's I've changed is wrong.
>
> Thanks,
> Dan.
>
Thanks for the additional feedback. I have tried to clarify the 
incompatibility entries for the secure server.

Regards,
-Rick

Mime
View raw message