db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rick Hillegas <Richard.Hille...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Q: Should Derby 10.3 be Derby 11?
Date Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:20:17 GMT
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
> Rick Hillegas wrote:
>> Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
>>> Rick Hillegas wrote:
>>>> Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
>>>>> ...
>>>>> A wiki page with the proposed backwards compatibility issues 
>>>>> listed together and with definition(s) of secure-by-default would 
>>>>> be good. Since Rick seems to be proposing most of the backwards 
>>>>> compatibility issues he seems like a good candidate to write the 
>>>>> initial version of the page. :-) It could be just the collection 
>>>>> of tables from the various functional specs.
>>>> The 10.3 release page now ends with a section which describes 
>>>> incompatibilities with the previous release: 
>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTenThreeRelease
>>> Thanks Rick, from a quick look the DBA powers section doesn't seem 
>>> to match the comments in DERBY-2264 related to requiring 
>>> authentication. But I'm not sure where that stands, (which is why a 
>>> summary is a good thing ;-)
>>> Dan.
>> Hi Dan,
>> I'm afraid I'm blind this morning. What discrepancy do you see 
>> between the 10.3 incompatibility section and the comments on DERBY-2264?
> The DBA powers section on the wiki page makes no mention that this 
> change is only in effect if authentication is enabled.
> This comment in DERBY-2264 seems to say that the restrictions are 
> enforced when authentication is enabled.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2264#action_12474538
> Dan.
Thanks, Dan. I have updated the wiki page to clarify that the 
restrictions depend on authentication.


View raw message