Rick Hillegas wrote:
> Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
>> Rick Hillegas wrote:
>>> Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> A wiki page with the proposed backwards compatibility issues listed
>>>> together and with definition(s) of secure-by-default would be good.
>>>> Since Rick seems to be proposing most of the backwards compatibility
>>>> issues he seems like a good candidate to write the initial version
>>>> of the page. :-) It could be just the collection of tables from the
>>>> various functional specs.
>>> The 10.3 release page now ends with a section which describes
>>> incompatibilities with the previous release:
>>> http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTenThreeRelease
>>
>> Thanks Rick, from a quick look the DBA powers section doesn't seem to
>> match the comments in DERBY-2264 related to requiring authentication.
>> But I'm not sure where that stands, (which is why a summary is a good
>> thing ;-)
>>
>> Dan.
>>
> Hi Dan,
>
> I'm afraid I'm blind this morning. What discrepancy do you see between
> the 10.3 incompatibility section and the comments on DERBY-2264?
The DBA powers section on the wiki page makes no mention that this
change is only in effect if authentication is enabled.
This comment in DERBY-2264 seems to say that the restrictions are
enforced when authentication is enabled.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2264#action_12474538
Dan.
|