db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rick Hillegas <Richard.Hille...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Q: Should Derby 10.3 be Derby 11?
Date Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:40:14 GMT
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
> Rick Hillegas wrote:
>> Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
>>> ...
>>>
>>> A wiki page with the proposed backwards compatibility issues listed 
>>> together and with definition(s) of secure-by-default would be good. 
>>> Since Rick seems to be proposing most of the backwards compatibility 
>>> issues he seems like a good candidate to write the initial version 
>>> of the page. :-) It could be just the collection of tables from the 
>>> various functional specs.
>> The 10.3 release page now ends with a section which describes 
>> incompatibilities with the previous release: 
>> http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTenThreeRelease
>
> Thanks Rick, from a quick look the DBA powers section doesn't seem to 
> match the comments in DERBY-2264 related to requiring authentication. 
> But I'm not sure where that stands, (which is why a summary is a good 
> thing ;-)
>
> Dan.
>
Hi Dan,

I'm afraid I'm blind this morning. What discrepancy do you see between 
the 10.3 incompatibility section and the comments on DERBY-2264?

Thanks,
-Rick

Mime
View raw message