db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (DERBY-2287) JDBC meta data for precision and size is inconsistent and does not match JDBC specifications.
Date Wed, 07 Feb 2007 16:01:05 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471010
] 

Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-2287:
----------------------------------------------

Getting them consistent I think is correct, but does the value being returned match the JDBC
4 definition for precision?

Looking at the javadoc comments for the constants I would guess DOUBLE_PRECISION_IN_DIGITS
is the better match for JDBC 4, though I haven't cross checked with JDBC 4.

	// precision in number of bits 
        public static final int DOUBLE_PRECISION                        = 52;
	// the ResultSetMetaData needs to have the precision for numeric data
	// in decimal digits, rather than number of bits, so need a separate constant.
        public static final int DOUBLE_PRECISION_IN_DIGITS              = 15;


> JDBC meta data for precision and size is inconsistent and does not match JDBC specifications.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-2287
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2287
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JDBC, Network Client
>    Affects Versions: 10.0.2.0, 10.0.2.1, 10.1.1.0, 10.1.2.1, 10.1.3.1, 10.2.1.6, 10.2.2.0
>            Reporter: Daniel John Debrunner
>            Priority: Minor
>
> JDBC 4.0 has clarified the definitions of precision in the java doc for various methods
that return precision or size. The concept of precision and size seems to be the same, just
having different method or column names in various situations.
> Derby does not follow the JDBC 4 specifications consistently, for example -1 is sometimes
used to indicate not applicable, where JBDC 4 says NULL or 0. The precision of datetime columns
is defined to be non-zero but in some situations Derby returns 0.
> jdbcapi.DatabaseMetaDataTest can show some of these issues, the test of getColumns()
should compare the information in the COLUMN_SIZE column to the ResultSetMetaData getPrecision()
method for the same column. The comparisions are not made currently because the number of
mismatches is high. [this code is not yet committed].
> Existing application impact as Derby applications may have been relying on the old incorrect
& inconsistent behaviour.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message