db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (DERBY-2327) Reduce monitor contention in LockSet
Date Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:22:05 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12472704

Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-2327:

Does it make sense to use java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap and have two implementation
of the lock factory.
Ie. use Java's existing mechanisms to solve this problem rather than re-inventing stuff?
Obviously the benefit would only be seeon on JDK 5.0 or later but I don't think that's a problem.

> Reduce monitor contention in LockSet
> ------------------------------------
>                 Key: DERBY-2327
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2327
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Performance, Services
>    Affects Versions:
>            Reporter: Knut Anders Hatlen
>            Priority: Minor
> When multiple threads enter the lock manager, only one can access the hash table in LockSet.
To improve scalability on multiple CPUs, it should be possible to have more than one thread
accessing the lock table at the same time.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message