db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Laura Stewart" <scotsmat...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [docs] unsure about (c)
Date Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:32:10 GMT
On 1/26/07, Jean T. Anderson <jta@bristowhill.com> wrote:
> scott hutinger wrote:
> > 2)  Not related, but should the version number be in all headers, and
> > not just the table of contents?  I wasn't certain about this, but I know
> > I get a mess of papers that might not have a device to hook them
> > together (staple), so might like the version in the header?
>
> I don't have a strong opinion about this.
>
>  -jean

I don't see the version number in the TOC.  What I see is the word
"Copyright" in the header (in both the alpha and 10.2 release books).

To me what makes more sense is to have a footer that has the name of
the book and version number, rather than something in the header.

-- 
Laura Stewart

Mime
View raw message