db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Laura Stewart" <scotsmat...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-2013) The order of the statements is not alphabetical within the reference manual
Date Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:15:17 GMT
Hi Kim  -

I don't want to reopen this issue since these are different problems
than 2013 addressed.  I also don't think that you should bury them in
1920.  When I first started on Derby, I was told to try to keep the
updates consistent with the JIRA issue. Making additional significant
changes makes it difficult for the originator of the issue to
review/comment and approve.

So I recommend creating a new issue to address the things that you
mention below :-)

On 1/6/07, Kim Haase (JIRA) <jira@apache.org> wrote:
>    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12462718
> Kim Haase commented on DERBY-2013:
> ----------------------------------
> The reorganization is really great, Laura -- I think it makes the manual a lot easier
to use. Adding the new header topics helps a lot.
> I notice a few minor ordering issues.
> 1) The SUM and TAN functions need to be switched for alphabetical order.
> 2) The system functions and procedures are not in alphabetical order. Is there some reason
why not?
> 3) The JDBC reference section isn't in alphabetical order either. It might make sense
to reorder it to correspond with the javadoc (which separates interfaces, classes, and exceptions
into subgroups and orders them alphabetically). I'd also suggest putting java.sql.Driver.getPropertyInfo
in a subtopic under java.sql.Driver.
> If you don't want to reopen this issue (these are sort of far afield from the original
issue of statement order), I could make some or all of the fixes as part of DERBY-1920.

Laura Stewart

View raw message