db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rick Hillegas <Richard.Hille...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: 10.3 wiki page question
Date Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:39:40 GMT
Hi Mike,

I agree that the "Bug Fix Candidates" heading is misleading because the 
query sweeps up all open 10.3 issues, including bugs, features, and 
documentation. I agree that "Bug Fix Candidates" should have a more 
focussed query associated with it. Sounds like you're happy to wire a 
narrower one into that slot and that sounds fine to me. I think we 
should leave the original query hanging around, however. I expect it 
will be useful too.


Mike Matrigali wrote:
> The 10.3 page: 
> http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTenThreeRelease?highlight=%28TenThree%29 
> has a heading: 10.3 Bug Fix Candidates
> but the query seems to include more than just bugs.  Was that the 
> intent, or should the query be changed.  It also seems to include 
> documentation fixes which look like they were meant to be tracked 
> separately in the next section.  I would find it interesting to
> track intended 10.3 bug fixes vs. features separately.  I can of
> course create my own queries, but just wanted ask first the intent
> of the existing query.
> And to 10.3 bug fix planning, anyone have any ideas how to best do this.
> We have a set of bugs that we thought important enough to mark 10.2.2 at
> one point and then they sort of got shifted to 10.2.3 and 10.2.4 (or 
> something like that - not sure).  Is it time to shift them to 10.3?
> I took a quick look at just the 10.3 bug candidates and cleaned up a 
> little - if I got it wrong, please feel free to update.

View raw message