db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ole Solberg <Ole.Solb...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Regression Test Report - tinderbox_trunk15 489597 - Sun DBTG
Date Fri, 22 Dec 2006 13:46:11 GMT
Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
> Ole.Solberg@Sun.COM writes:
> 
>> [Auto-generated mail]
>>
>> *tinderbox_trunk15* 489597/2006-12-22 11:12:19 CET
>>
>> Failed  Tests    OK  Skip  Duration       Suite
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> *Jvm: 1.5*
>>   SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
>>     26    517    491     0   118.48%     derbyall
>>     UNKNOWN    UNKNOWN    UNKNOWN     UNKNOWN     0.00%     org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.suites.All
>>   Details in      http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/tinderbox_trunk15/jvm1.5/testing/Limited/testSummary-489597.html

>>   Attempted failure analysis in
>>                   http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/tinderbox_trunk15/jvm1.5/FailReports/489597.html

>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Changes in      http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/tinderbox_trunk15/UpdateInfo/489597.txt

>>
>> ( All results in http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/ ) 
> 
> Hmm... It seems like the Tinderbox test ran with jvm 1.6, but produced
> JDBC 3.0 output. Doesn't the Tinderbox test normally use jvm 1.5? I
> would guess it's failing because the jars were built without JDBC 4.0
> support.
> 

I decided to change the Tinderbox test to use 1.6 but managed to specify
the wrong ant.properties.... file :-(
Hopefully correct on next run.

-- Ole


Mime
View raw message