db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel John Debrunner <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-2109) System privileges
Date Tue, 19 Dec 2006 16:47:09 GMT
Oystein Grovlen - Sun Norway wrote:
> Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
>  > So maybe if Derby is booted as a standalone server with no security
>  > manager involved, it should install one with a default security
>  > policy. Thus allowing Derby to use Java security manager to manage
>  > system privileges but not requiring everyone to become familiar with
>  > them.
> I like this idea very much.  Will there be any backward comptibility
> issues if we make Derby secure-by-default like this?

I don't believe so. I think a default policy file would cover the 
majority of users without change. For those who the policy file did not 
work they could run without a security manager or a different policy 
file. I.e. I think it would a deliberate change to improve security that 
might require some users to make minor configuration changes to use the 
new version.


View raw message