db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel John Debrunner <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Should be a statement with error allowed to do a rollback of the active transaction
Date Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:56:02 GMT
Saurabh Vyas wrote:
> So what you mean to say that rolling back of transaction should be 
> dependent on the application's behavior. If my understanding is correct, 
> then in DERBY-2017, the way I tried to handle the case in not correct.
> How this case should be handled then?

 From looking at the comments in DEBRY-2017 the question that jumps out 
to me is why is the parameter being checked by the client after the 
execute has occurred on the embedded driver? Seems like pushing the 
check into the embedded engine might make more sense.


View raw message