db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Julius Stroffek <Julius.Strof...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Should be a statement with error allowed to do a rollback of the active transaction
Date Fri, 08 Dec 2006 12:22:47 GMT
Could we unify the behavior of the embedded configuration and a derby net ?

Julo

Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
> Bryan Pendleton <bpendleton@amberpoint.com> writes:
>
>   
>>> The key question is whether the statement with error should (or
>>> could) rollback the active transaction? 
>>>       
>> Does this same situation arise with an embedded configuration? If so, how
>> does the embedded engine handle your test case?
>>     
>
> With an embedded configuration, the result of executing the statement
> which fails is exactly the same as not executing the statement. That
> is, nothing is changed in the database regardless of autocommit mode
> and whether commit() is called. Also, it doesn't roll back any other
> uncommitted changes made by that transaction.
>
>   

Mime
View raw message