db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kasper Nielsen <n...@kav.dk>
Subject Re: Blog response to Oracle white paper
Date Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:54:55 GMT
David Van Couvering wrote:
> Thanks, Mike, for your great comments on the white paper.  I took those 
> comments and added my own in a blog response:
> http://weblogs.java.net/blog/davidvc/archive/2006/11/oracle_benchmar_1.html
Hi David,

Just a quick comment. I think you may want to omit or at least rephrase 
the following sentence:
You may not need SQL today, but think about if you may need it later. I 
have seen way too many projects that started with a simple key/value 
storage, only to add on query support, secondary indexes, and so on, as 
the project grows in complexity

Because Berkeley DB Java supports both secondary indexes, querying, 
various degrees of transaction isolation, cursor support, row level 
locking, etc. Its primarily the missing SQL support that sets it apart 
from traditional databases.

Other then that, great post.

View raw message