Return-Path: 
 <derby-dev-return-30062-apmail-db-derby-dev-archive=db.apache.org@db.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 25088 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2006 17:57:46 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Sep 2006 17:57:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 89309 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2006 17:57:46 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org
Received: (qmail 89282 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2006 17:57:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:derby-dev-help@db.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:derby-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:derby-dev@db.apache.org>
List-Id: <derby-dev.db.apache.org>
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org
Received: (qmail 89257 invoked by uid 99); 18 Sep 2006 17:57:46 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:57:46 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0
	tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of scotsmatrix@gmail.com designates
 66.249.92.175 as permitted sender)
Received: from [66.249.92.175] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.175)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:57:43 -0700
Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id g33so426807ugd
        for <derby-dev@db.apache.org>; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:57:22 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=cXTcIHZyXwx1SCvj33SUyVwGiYCkcYJmHIHqq8O8lDSPaLbZOA9wn3qFsz3UmWTRIkNTIyKzixrEjPJq+miAQve7w56fB+UPoCxkKTasE7y4uKm3SfXS4zIT8KaPhEtazaSN+718Zn2u4B3sgxuLAOKRrIG4h44Nhacg5IXrI9c=
Received: by 10.67.101.10 with SMTP id d10mr7375019ugm;
        Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.255.1 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <9f40b500609181057y6c39652dj7e97294f5949eab7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:57:21 -0700
From: "Laura Stewart" <scotsmatrix@gmail.com>
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-1271) Release documentation for JDBC4
 release
In-Reply-To: <16071541.1158340225060.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <805804.1146510526449.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
	 <16071541.1158340225060.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

On 9/15/06, Jean T. Anderson (JIRA) <derby-dev@db.apache.org> wrote:
>
> I have one remaining question regarding the version number that gets output. Here's the DITA source that produces that paragraph:
...
> Here's the refconrefs.dita entry for the fullversionnumber variable:
>
>   <p><ph id="fullversionnumber">Version 10.2</ph></p>
>
> Should I leave it be? Or change it from 10.2 to 10.2.1?
>
> Any other DITA changes?
>

Hi Jean -

Yes, you should probably change it, and as Rick suggested, in all of
the conref files for each book.  There shouldn't be any other DITA
changes needed.

-- 
Laura Stewart