Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 36371 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2006 20:26:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 2006 20:26:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 86588 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2006 20:26:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 86380 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2006 20:26:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 86371 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2006 20:26:24 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:26:24 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of jta@bristowhill.com designates 66.75.162.136 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.75.162.136] (HELO ms-smtp-04.socal.rr.com) (66.75.162.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:26:13 -0700 Received: from [192.168.15.53] (cpe-72-130-190-172.san.res.rr.com [72.130.190.172]) by ms-smtp-04.socal.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8FKOrNW021898 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:24:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <450B0C15.6090809@bristowhill.com> Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:24:53 -0700 From: "Jean T. Anderson" Reply-To: jta@bristowhill.com User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc3 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derby Development Subject: [doc] "fullversionnumber" variable for the devguide is set differently X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I'm putting the JDBC 4.0 warning text into a variable in the conrefs.dita file for each book, which lets me simply include a reference in each file that needs the warning that looks like this :

The new variable uses the "fullversionnumber" variable that is already defined in the conrefs.dita files. Most books set it like this:

Version 10.2 But the devguide set it to this (and it really lept out at me in the drafts of the JDBC 4 warning text that I'm reviewing):

Open Source

I'm going to modify the devguide to use "Version 10.2" like the others. If anybody can think of anything that might break as a result, please let me know. thanks, -jean