db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Laura Stewart" <scotsmat...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Doc notice for JDBC 4 functionality in Derby 10.2
Date Wed, 13 Sep 2006 22:27:46 GMT
On 9/13/06, Jean T. Anderson <jta@bristowhill.com> wrote:
> how's this for consolidating yours and mine latest:
> This documentation references new JDBC 4.0 functionality that is not
> enabled in this Apache Derby 10.2 release because a final Java SE 6
> release was not available when this release was produced. JDBC 3.0 will
> be available by default when used with a Java SE 6 virtual machine. JDBC
> 4.0 functionality will only be available to developers who download Java
> SE 6 themselves and with it build Derby's optional JDBC 4.0 support.
> Please see the Release Notes for details on how to build this optional
> JDBC 4.0 functionality. ***Please also note the licensing restrictions
> which limit your use of beta versions of Java SE 6. The beta JDK may
> only be used for evaluation purposes; the same restriction applies to
> Derby's JDBC 4.0 support when built using the beta version of Java SE 6.***

Hi Jean -
Just a couple of things that you might want to be aware of:

* Try to avoid using "it" as in "...themselves and with it build Derby's..."
"it" might refer to several things, and for people for whom English is
not there first language it can be difficult to determine which thing
you are referring to.  So it would be clearer to say "themselves and
with Java SE 6, build..."  Part of this confusion is because the
sentence is really long :-)

* It might be good to change this phrase "not available when this
release was produced" to avoid using "this release". The sentences
here are are talking about both the Derby and the JDBC releases and it
is better to specify the release as in "not available when this Derby
release was produced."

* It is better to avoid concatenations like "Derby's" if you can.
They can be difficult to translate. For example, ...to Derby's JDBC
4.0 support..." would be better as "to the to JDBC 4.0 support in

These are merely suggestions for clarity.

Laura Stewart

View raw message