db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Laura Stewart" <scotsmat...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: GRANT/REVOKE functional spec and database owner
Date Wed, 06 Sep 2006 16:52:08 GMT
On 9/1/06, Daniel John Debrunner <djd@apache.org> wrote:
>
> The new database owner section in the GRANT/REVOKE functional spec
> attached to DERBY-464 has this text:
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12338762/grantRevokeSpec_v5.html
>
> "Database owners assume the authorizationId of  other users while
> operating in their user schemas. Objects created by database owners in
> other user schemas would be owned by that user."
>
> The first sentence is not what Derby is doing today:
>
> ij> set schema wilma;
> 0 rows inserted/updated/deleted
> ij> values current_user;
> 1
> --------------------------------
> DBO
> 1 row selected
>
> I think the code has the correct behaviour, I think was intended was
> trying to explain the next sentence about the objects not being owned by
> the DBA. I don't think the first sentence is needed, the second stands
> by itself.
>
> Dan.
>
>
>
>

I am not sure that I understand what you want changed... do you want
the first sentence removed because the second sentence stands on it's
own?
Please open a JIRA issue for this change and log it in the DocReviews
http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/TenTwoDocReview

-- 
Laura Stewart

Mime
View raw message