db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Army <qoz...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-1866) Assert failure in sane mode for queries that used to work in
Date Thu, 21 Sep 2006 23:51:20 GMT
Rick Hillegas wrote:
> I see your point. DERBY-1777 doesn't indicate that the defect occurs in 
> 10.1.3. However, I see now that DERBY-1633 and DERBY-1681 do. Perhaps I 
> should share more of my calculus with you:

<snip all very good points>

> I'm happy to hear arguments about why this issue should hold up the 
> release.

No, no arguments at all.  Sorry if it sounded like I was looking for a reversal 
of your decision.  I wasn't debating the decision, just looking for 
clarification about 1) why 1866 didn't make the cut but the others did, and 2) 
how (or if) we make the user-base aware of the regression.

I think you've answered both of those questions--so thanks!

Carry on, carry on...

View raw message