db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rick Hillegas <Richard.Hille...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Revised 10.2 contents
Date Wed, 13 Sep 2006 23:20:28 GMT
Hi David,

I agree. If we have converged on a plan, then we should let the user 
community know as soon as possible.

Regards,
-Rick

David Van Couvering wrote:

> Perhaps it would be good to offer a similar summary to derby-user if 
> there are no objections to the below proposal?
>
> David
>
> Rick Hillegas wrote:
>
>> I just wanted to confirm that we have reached consensus on the 
>> revised contents of the 10.2 release and that we do not need to call 
>> a vote. Please speak up if you don't agree or if you think we need to 
>> formalize our decision with a vote:
>>
>> 1) 10.2 will be distributed with the source code for our JDBC4 
>> implementation but not the compiled JDBC4 implementation.
>>
>> 2) By default, when run on Java SE 6, 10.2 will expose our JDBC3 
>> implementation.
>>
>> 3) The user guides will continue to document the behavior of both the 
>> JDBC3 and JDB4 implementations, will state that JDBC3 is the default 
>> implementation even when running on Java SE 6, and will refer the 
>> user to the Release Notes for details on how to build and exercise 
>> the optional JDBC4 implementation.
>>
>> Regards,
>> -Rick
>>
>>


Mime
View raw message