Mike Matrigali wrote:
> I skipped the original posting, took a look at subject and was not
> really interested in CURRENT TIME handling. But I happened to look
> back and think it is valuable reading about the compilation/execution
> engine. The write
> up is interesting, and gives some insite into compile vs. runtime
> decisions.
Thanks Mike, yes the first part of the subject was meant to be the
important part, next time I'll make it something like:
The perils of complexity (example from CURRENT TIME handling)
Dan.
|