db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mamta A. Satoor (JIRA)" <derby-...@db.apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (DERBY-1787) The database owner is incorrectly referred to as dba in the code comments that were checked in Derby 10.2 for grant revoke work. We should clean this up at some point.
Date Wed, 20 Sep 2006 18:30:27 GMT
     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1787?page=all ]

Mamta A. Satoor updated DERBY-1787:
-----------------------------------

      Assignee: Mamta A. Satoor
    Derby Info: [Patch Available]

> The database owner is incorrectly referred to as dba in the code comments that were checked
in Derby 10.2 for grant revoke work. We should clean this up at some point.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-1787
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1787
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions: 10.2.1.0
>            Reporter: Mamta A. Satoor
>         Assigned To: Mamta A. Satoor
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: DERBY1787_UseCorrectTerminologyV1diff.txt
>
>
> Grant revoke functionality was added in Derby 10.2 The comments that went into the grant
revoke code, in some places refer to database owner as "dba". They are not the same thing.
In the grant revoke world, dba is a role. We haven't added roles into Derby yet but current
use of dba in comments might make it confusing when we do start working on roles including
dba.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message