Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of dremesh@gmail.com designates
 66.249.82.232 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=ekIpX5dvhCeNrXmc4GsaxG+joTSNULQl1bZFzEpf3znWi/mM7Tvz3BJrHIZjqjg2Fj2j9LsJUPKftgXHCbyWQIDLsbiF1wFjic73+04SnrS/4sbcyYrbRyocpA46YnXEkxILvGiAdnCrX9Y283ShvHaqjB+oSw37eXmFA8zXYg8=
Message-ID: <58ed70f50608301445v6dc5a00as4e44b62b48c7e047@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:45:42 -0700
From: "Deepa Remesh" <dremesh@gmail.com>
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org, jta@bristowhill.com
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-1551) Update documentation to indicate
 procedures can be called from triggers (DERBY-551)
In-Reply-To: <44F60397.4020208@bristowhill.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <21243944.1156968023294.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
	 <44F60397.4020208@bristowhill.com>

On 8/30/06, Jean T. Anderson <jta@bristowhill.com> wrote:
> Deepa Remesh (JIRA) wrote:
> >     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1551?page=comments#action_12431671 ]
> >
> > Deepa Remesh commented on DERBY-1551:
> > -------------------------------------
> >
> > I think this change (svn revision 430925) missed the mega-merge. Can a committer please merge this doc change to 10.2 branch?
> >
>
> Hi, Deepa,
>
> I checked the "Subversion Commits" tab for DERBY-1551. 430925 involved
> two files and it looks like both were merged into the 10.2 branch.
>
> what makes you think it was missed in the mega-merge?


Thanks Jean for checking. I think I looked at svn commit messages and
didn't see one with this revision number. I should have just looked at
the "Subversion Commits" tab. I'll close the issue. Sorry for the
noise.


>
> And now I'm spotting an issue with updates to rrefexcept71493.dita,
> which was part of 430925 -- it's going to be overwritten by DERBY-1566,
> which will update all the sqlstates.
>

I'll take a look at DERBY-1566.

Thanks,
Deepa