Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:12:26 -0700
From: Rick Hillegas <Richard.Hillegas@Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-1746) upgrade tests should start using
 10.1.3 released builds
In-reply-to: <c25576af0608241346n308416a8p9b4545b08c6bc84f@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: Richard.Hillegas@Sun.COM
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Message-id: <44EE163A.6010509@sun.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
References: <17583526.1156269974005.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
 <19815477.1156450641955.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
 <c25576af0608241346n308416a8p9b4545b08c6bc84f@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)

Hi, Myrna,

Thanks for your patience as I figure out my piloting error here. I cd'd 
to what I thought was the indicated directory and moused in the svn 
command from the JIRA. This is what happened:

rick_sun testing (1.4) > pwd
/home/rh161140/derby/branches/10.2/tools/testing
rick_sun testing (1.4) > ls
derby  i18nTestGenerator
rick_sun testing (1.4) > svn propedit svn:externals derby
svn: 'derby' is not under version control

Regards,
-Rick

Myrna van Lunteren wrote:

> On 8/24/06, Rick Hillegas (JIRA) <derby-dev@db.apache.org> wrote:
>
>>    [ 
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1746?page=comments#action_12430281 
>> ]
>>
>> Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1746:
>> --------------------------------------
>>
>> I'm afraid I'm a bit confused about what to do with these patches:
>>
>> ---------------- Trunk Patch -----------------------------
>>
>> After I apply this patch to the trunk, I see the following diffs in 
>> the 10_1_10_2 test:
>>
>> 702a703
>> > 
>> ,APP,DERBY655T2,C21_ID,,APP,DERBY655T1,C11_ID,1,3,0,F_12,xxxxGENERATED-IDxxxx,7 
>>
>> 707 del
>> < complete caseVersionCheck - passed true
>> 707a708
>> > complete caseVersionCheck - passed false
>> 1462 del
>> < END - PASS - phase SOFT UPGRADE
>> 1462a1463
>> > END - FAIL - phase SOFT UPGRADE
>> 2166a2168
>> > 
>> ,APP,DERBY655T2,C21_ID,,APP,DERBY655T1,C11_ID,1,3,0,F_12,xxxxGENERATED-IDxxxx,7 
>>
>> 2171 del
>> < complete caseVersionCheck - passed true
>> 2171a2173
>> > complete caseVersionCheck - passed false
>> 2953 del
>> < END - PASS - phase UPGRADE
>> 2953a2955
>> > END - FAIL - phase UPGRADE
>> Test Failed.
>> *** End:   Upgrade_10_1_10_2 jdk1.4.2_08 2006-08-24 09:12:23 ***
>>
>> I think that the lines beginning with ",APP,DERBY655T2," are new 
>> diffs added by this patch. It seems that this patch is making the 
>> results dirtier rather than cleaner.
>>
>> In addition, I don't think we should be running a test called 
>> 10_1_10_2 in the trunk. We should be running some other tests, 
>> perhaps 10_1_to_Current and 10_2_to_Current in the trunk. Perhaps 
>> 10_1_10_2 becomes the basis for 10_1_to_Current.
>>
>
> I'm wondering if you missed the tail end of my comment when attaching 
> the file:
>
> "I assume patch or eclipse-apply-patch won't deal with the changing of
> properties, so here is the svn command:
> (when cd-ed to the top of the branch)
> cd tools/testing
> svn propedit svn:externals derby
> & change to:
> derby/10.1 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/db/derby/jars/10.1.3.1
> (note: svn update required after to see the files changed) "
>
> The whole point of this patch is to run with 10.1.3.1 jars...Were you
> doing that?
>
> Thx,
> Myrna