Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Message-ID: <20289911.1155234315212.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Kathey Marsden (JIRA)" <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-1641) Conglomerate requested does not exist
 after syscs_import_table with FK
In-Reply-To: <9923026.1154650035571.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1641?page=all ]

Kathey Marsden updated DERBY-1641:
----------------------------------

    Component/s: Store

put this as component store. Not sure if that is right.

> Conglomerate requested does not exist after syscs_import_table with FK
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-1641
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1641
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Store
>    Affects Versions: 10.1.3.1
>         Environment: Java 1.5.0_06-b05 Linux (CentOS 4)
>            Reporter: Matt Frantz
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 10.2.0.0
>
>
> I have a repeatable sequence that always causes the "Conglomerate (X) requested does not exist" error on my system.  There are several steps.  You can use "ij" as follows:
> 1. Start with a new database, e.g. connect 'jdbc:derby:test;create=true';
> 2. create table y( pk integer primary key );
> 3. insert into y values (123);
> 4. create table z( pk integer not null primary key references y );
> 5. Create a file containing a single row of ASCII data with the number "123" (in ASCII) in it.  e.g. /tmp/z
> 6. call syscs_util.syscs_import_table( null, 'Z', '/tmp/z', ',', '''', null, 1 );
> 7. Try to access the "Z" table, e.g. SELECT * FROM z; or DROP TABLE z;
> At this point, I always get the error.  I can use this sequence in other contexts, but the difference, as far as I can tell, is that the table "Z" has a column that is both PK and FK.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira