db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jean T. Anderson" <...@bristowhill.com>
Subject Re: DERBY-119: any objections to committing to trunk?
Date Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:21:54 GMT
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
> Jean T. Anderson wrote: 
>>Bryan Pendleton wrote:
>>
>>>I propose to commit DERBY-119 to the trunk within the next week.
>>>
>>>  http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-119
>>>
>>>This is a new feature, and should not be merged to 10.2, but my
>>>understanding is that all the mass-merging from the trunk to 10.2
>>>is complete and it is ok to start putting new work into the trunk.
>>
>>for the docs, Rick had just suggested adding any exclusions to the end
>>of http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/TenTwoRelease :
>>
>>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-dev/200608.mbox/%3c44E39F0C.3050608@sun.com%3e
>>
>>(In fact the docs are easy because everything being committed to the
>>trunk right now is a mega merge candidate.)
>>
>>At any rate, I *think* all you need to do is list your addition to that
>>Wiki page.
> 
> I thought the mega-merges had been completed? Rick said it was up to
> individuals to merge items.

yep, you're right! I found Rick's post [1] which says:

>  From this point onward, the trunk is open to feature work which will 
> not go into 10.2. In addition, from now on, all 10.2 patches need to be 
> committed to both the trunk and the 10.2 branch. 

 -jean

[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-dev/200608.mbox/%3c44E61445.3000809@sun.com%3e



Mime
View raw message