db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kathey Marsden <kmarsdende...@sbcglobal.net>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Approve coding conventions for the Derby project
Date Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:31:44 GMT
Rick Hillegas wrote:

> -1
> On the whole, I think that the proposed guidelines are decent. 
> However, I would like us to emphasize that these are guidelines and 
> not laws.
I too think we should not be militant about this, think clarity is key, 
and don't want to see inserted layers of tools to enforce pure structure 
long term.  This is why I proposed we change the ContributorChecklist to 
use the word "convention"  and not "standard"  indicating that it is a 
custom or practice. I think that the current wording captures that well 
and is sufficiently soft  considering the   db project guidelines 
actually sound much more strict

from : http://db.apache.org/source.html.

All Java Language source code in the repository must be written in 
conformance to the " Code Conventions for the Java Programming Language 
<http://java.sun.com/docs/codeconv/html/CodeConvTOC.doc.html> as 
published by Sun, or in conformance with another well-defined convention 
specified by the subproject.

Also,  I wanted to mention that it would have been most helpful to get 
this input in response to earlier threads requesting adjustments to 
content and wording.  I hope that you will  reconsider whether  further 
wording adjustments are needed at this point.  Perhaps they could occur 
at the happy time that we take out the Note: section.



View raw message