Return-Path: 
 <derby-dev-return-24187-apmail-db-derby-dev-archive=db.apache.org@db.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 60142 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2006 16:15:32 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2006 16:15:32 -0000
Received: (qmail 52781 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2006 16:15:31 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org
Received: (qmail 52750 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2006 16:15:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:derby-dev-help@db.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:derby-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:derby-dev@db.apache.org>
List-Id: <derby-dev.db.apache.org>
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org
Received: (qmail 52741 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2006 16:15:31 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:15:31 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=10.0
	tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: 32.97.110.154 is neither permitted nor
 denied by domain of qozinx@gmail.com)
Received: from [32.97.110.154] (HELO e36.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.154)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:15:30 -0700
Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com
 [9.17.195.106])
	by e36.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k6HGF93h016080
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL)
	for <derby-dev@db.apache.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2006 12:15:09 -0400
Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com
 [9.17.195.168])
	by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.6/NCO/VER7.0) with ESMTP id
 k6HGF8QQ183956
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <derby-dev@db.apache.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2006 10:15:09 -0600
Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])
	by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id
 k6HGF8ht029847
	for <derby-dev@db.apache.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2006 10:15:08 -0600
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (svl-arbrown.svl.ibm.com [9.30.38.165])
	by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
 k6HGF7sX029765
	for <derby-dev@db.apache.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2006 10:15:08 -0600
Message-ID: <44BBB78B.6060303@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:15:07 -0700
From: Army <qozinx@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
 rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040707
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-1357) Short-circuit logic in optimizer
 appears to be incorrect...
References: <7826241.1152900434754.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
 <44B7EF3A.8080100@gmail.com> <44B95B44.6060702@amberpoint.com>
In-Reply-To: <44B95B44.6060702@amberpoint.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Bryan Pendleton wrote:

> I agree that this is a hard case, and I can see both sides. But I do think
> that we can craft an umbrella release note which will be valuable to users
> as they move to the new release, covering the multiple changes to the
> optimizer as a single logical unit. It seems to me that the release note
> should observe that:

<snip details of release note suggestions>

This sounds like a great idea.  I will try to write something up and post it to 
DERBY-1357 and/or DERBY-781 shortly.

Thanks for excellent suggestion,
Army