Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 11649 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2006 19:55:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jul 2006 19:55:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 93953 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2006 19:55:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 93915 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2006 19:55:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 93904 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2006 19:55:23 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 12:55:23 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [192.18.42.249] (HELO nwkea-pix-1.sun.com) (192.18.42.249) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 12:55:21 -0700 Received: from d1-sfbay-02.sun.com ([192.18.39.112]) by nwkea-pix-1.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k6DJt1AP008631 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 12:55:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.d1-sfbay-02.sun.com by d1-sfbay-02.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.02 (built Sep 9 2005)) id <0J2C00701XMC6W00@d1-sfbay-02.sun.com> (original mail from David.Vancouvering@Sun.COM) for derby-dev@db.apache.org; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 12:55:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.9.61.102] by d1-sfbay-02.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.02 (built Sep 9 2005)) with ESMTPSA id <0J2C005BOXZO2810@d1-sfbay-02.sun.com> for derby-dev@db.apache.org; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 12:55:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 12:55:13 -0700 From: David Van Couvering Subject: Re: Choice of JMX implementations In-reply-to: <44B6A383.4080202@bristowhill.com> Sender: David.Vancouvering@Sun.COM To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Message-id: <44B6A521.2020900@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <44B6A383.4080202@bristowhill.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060427) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N That doesn't *look* like a JMX implementation, but a set of utilities on top of JMX. Nice idea, though. David Jean T. Anderson wrote: > Sanket Sharma wrote: >> Just wanted an opinion about JMX implementation to use for Derby. I >> have listed the better known implementations below with my comments: > > is Geronimo an option? > > http://geronimo.apache.org/api/org/apache/geronimo/kernel/jmx/package-summary.html > > -jean