Thanks, Kathey. I think this does capture what I mean. I think this is
your proposal:
Priority - Means "severity" according to the JIRA definitions.
Urgency - Has the common-sense meaning of priority, not to be confused
with the JIRA sense.
For current 10.2 issues:
Priority==Blocker => Urgency=Blocker
Priority==Critical => Urgency=Urgent
Priority==Major => Urgency=Normal
Priority==Minor => Urgency=Low
Priority==Trivial => Urgency=Low
Regards,
-Rick
Kathey Marsden wrote:
> Rick Hillegas wrote:
>
>>
>> How is this field used? Does it take two values (Urgent, NotUrgent)
>> or does it cover a broader spectrum?
>
>
> Here is the forrest definition, which looks closely correlated with
> with what we are trying to achieve.
> If I had my druthers I would alter Urgent a bit to include bugs and
> the word "Will" is a bit confusing. Regardless it looks like a good
> fit for our current release needs.
>
>
> http://forrest.apache.org/issues.html#urgency
>
> * None: The default. Not yet classified.
> * Blocker: Prevents other developers from working; or critical issue
> with functionality; or holds up the implementation of other
> functionality. Cannot release until it is fixed. Will be fixed ASAP.
> * Urgent: Is a key new feature; or affects many users. Will be fixed
> before the next release.
> * Normal: If this issue scratches the itch of any particular
> developer, then they should help to solve it and provide a patch.
> * Low: If this issue bothers you, then fix it because it is not a
> high priority for the project.
>
>
>
|