db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jean T. Anderson" <...@bristowhill.com>
Subject Re: Choice of JMX implementations
Date Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:56:43 GMT
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
> If the goal is to repackage any of these, I'm not sure that will be
> possible with any of the following, except for Apache Commons
> Modelling, but is that actually an implementation?
> For information on compatibility of other open source licenses with
> the ASL, see: http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html
> On 7/13/06, Sanket Sharma <sanketsharma@gmail.com> wrote:
>>          4. MX4J
> This has a modified BSD license with an advertising clause, and a
> restriction to downstream projects on naming. Not that we'd ever name
> our project MX4J, but it's an extra restriction that isn't in the ASL,
> so we might need to get a determination from legal-discuss on whether
> this is acceptable to redistribute.

here's one precedent for using MX4J at apache (and there might be more):



View raw message