db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Deepa Remesh (JIRA)" <derby-...@db.apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (DERBY-1029) Backout boolean work from the 10.2 branch immediately after the branch is created
Date Tue, 18 Jul 2006 21:02:14 GMT
    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1029?page=comments#action_12421965 ] 
Deepa Remesh commented on DERBY-1029:

I have not looked at the whole patch but I just noticed this patch updates a master file 'procedureInTrigger.out'.
I had used "true" in the sql for this test without remembering boolean work will be backed

ij> --- check index is not created
 select count(*) from SYS.SYSCONGLOMERATES where CONGLOMERATENAME='IX' and ISINDEX=true;
+ERROR 42X01: Syntax error: true.

Once boolean is backed out, this will not cover the intended test. I think the above sql can
be changed to use "1" instead of "true" to cover the intended test. I would appreciate if
you can handle this change in this patch.

> Backout boolean work from the 10.2 branch immediately after the branch is created
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: DERBY-1029
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1029
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions:
>            Reporter: Kathey Marsden
>         Assigned To: Rick Hillegas
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For:
>         Attachments: derby-1029_v03.diff
> There was discussion on the list regarding how  to handle this issue but keep the BOOLEAN
work for inclusion in future releases.  The approach discussed was to back the DERBY-499 work
out of the 10.2 branch as soon as it is created, but leave it in the trunk
> I think this an acceptable solution but  only if we can get someone assigned to this
issue that is willing to commit now to doing that work as soon as we branch.   The reverse
merge may be messy at that point do to other changes that have gone in.  
> Is there someone who will volunteer to do this work and assign themselves to this issue?

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


View raw message