Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of dremesh@gmail.com designates
 66.249.82.194 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=d6pzTXnRW0MppFbPqAfJ6OGSuGSaI/kG+tyGub1kHQb5pXdtlf295+6cGFybD6HZsX6z3PzXVNse/saUD31koFGMM+Oojku1LcPq3/HWwAz8CT4CtPvMOfDzP+0TZrXYZQqWrnSSIX9jyA4XQzTRVZBQ8gD1qHpee+8ZgnZ45rk=
Message-ID: <58ed70f50606021542g3e36ebb2uae5e4cd1a7bec700@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 15:42:49 -0700
From: "Deepa Remesh" <dremesh@gmail.com>
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: Re: Testing for 10.1.3
In-Reply-To: <1846492947.20060603002434@Sun.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <4463A714.8040104@Sun.COM> <447453F8.2040208@Sun.COM>
	 <1846492947.20060603002434@Sun.com>

On 6/2/06, John Embretsen <John.Embretsen@sun.com> wrote:

> The same test was run against the trunk not so long ago, and was able
> to run for at least 4 weeks without producing the same error (although
> memory usage graphs seem rather similar at first glance). I am assuming
> that this increased robustness (10.2 vs. 10.1) has something to do with
> the fact that DERBY-210 patches are in trunk, but not in the 10.1
> branch, as far as I know.
>

The patches were recently ported to10.1 branch (on 05/22/06) as part
of DERBY-1103.

Thanks,
Deepa