Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 47877 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2006 22:54:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jun 2006 22:54:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 41633 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2006 22:54:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 41418 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2006 22:54:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 41406 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2006 22:54:00 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jun 2006 15:54:00 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [192.18.1.36] (HELO gmpea-pix-1.sun.com) (192.18.1.36) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jun 2006 15:53:58 -0700 Received: from d1-emea-09.sun.com ([192.18.2.119]) by gmpea-pix-1.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k52MrbuC014653 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 23:53:37 +0100 (BST) Received: from conversion-daemon.d1-emea-09.sun.com by d1-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.02 (built Sep 9 2005)) id <0J09004018PJ8800@d1-emea-09.sun.com> (original mail from John.Embretsen@Sun.COM) for derby-dev@db.apache.org; Fri, 02 Jun 2006 23:53:36 +0100 (BST) Received: from EMBOFERRARI ([195.159.198.111]) by d1-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.02 (built Sep 9 2005)) with ESMTPSA id <0J0900JBQ8XCAY30@d1-emea-09.sun.com> for derby-dev@db.apache.org; Fri, 02 Jun 2006 23:53:36 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2006 00:45:05 +0200 From: John Embretsen Subject: Re: Testing for 10.1.3 In-reply-to: <58ed70f50606021542g3e36ebb2uae5e4cd1a7bec700@mail.gmail.com> Sender: John.Embretsen@Sun.COM To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Reply-to: derby-dev@db.apache.org Message-id: <1999276438.20060603004505@Sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.60.07) Professional Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Priority: 3 (Normal) References: <4463A714.8040104@Sun.COM> <447453F8.2040208@Sun.COM> <1846492947.20060603002434@Sun.com> <58ed70f50606021542g3e36ebb2uae5e4cd1a7bec700@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Saturday, June 3, 2006, 12:42:49 AM CET, Deepa Remesh wrote: > On 6/2/06, John Embretsen wrote: >> The same test was run against the trunk not so long ago, and was able >> to run for at least 4 weeks without producing the same error (although >> memory usage graphs seem rather similar at first glance). I am assuming >> that this increased robustness (10.2 vs. 10.1) has something to do with >> the fact that DERBY-210 patches are in trunk, but not in the 10.1 >> branch, as far as I know. >> > The patches were recently ported to10.1 branch (on 05/22/06) as part > of DERBY-1103. I did not notice that, thanks for letting me know... It did not make it in time for the 10.1.2.4 snapshot, so it is good to know that results for the final 10.1.3 release may be different (hopefully better!). -- John