db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrew McIntyre" <mcintyr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: catch-22: Derby, Mustang, and JCP issue
Date Fri, 23 Jun 2006 08:42:08 GMT
Errata from my last post, changes marked between ** ;-)

On 6/22/06, Andrew McIntyre <mcintyre.a@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...
> Presumably this is where the idea that you can't ship something that
> implements an interface in a *non-final* JSR comes from
>  ...
> Sun wants to release a version of *JavaDB based on Derby* with the JDK
> that ... includes javadoc *from* Derby that includes material copied from
> the JDBC 4 spec.
> ...
> so that *the Derby engine in JavaDB* reports itself as a *10.2.1.x*
> ...
> 2) Sun *could* release a version of Derby *as JavaDB* with JDK 1.6
> ...
> Hopefully they get this right and it upgrades *correctly* to the
> official *Derby 10.2.x release that includes the JDBC 4 interfaces*.

There are a couple of other places where I meant to say JavaDB instead
of Derby and vice versa, but hey, it can be confusing. (Derby !=
Cloudscape) most of the time either. :-)

cheers,
andrew

Mime
View raw message