db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jean T. Anderson" <...@bristowhill.com>
Subject Re: Status of adding BOOLEAN-type
Date Mon, 26 Jun 2006 14:35:33 GMT
Moving this thread back to derby-dev. Kristian responded to a thread
that was inadvertently put on derby-user.

Let's please keep release discussions on derby-dev. This is where
planning and decisions belong.

thanks,

 -jean

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Status of adding BOOLEAN-type (was: Re: Proposal for 10.2
release schedule)
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 15:40:28 +0200
From: Kristian Waagan <Kristian.Waagan@Sun.COM>
Reply-To: Derby Discussion <derby-user@db.apache.org>
Organization: Sun Microsystems Inc.
To: Derby Discussion <derby-user@db.apache.org>
References: <449AEAA7.8030109@sun.com>
<54ac72d70606231432h7b6e7069ibc4299042faa0798@mail.gmail.com>
<449C7158.8050804@sun.com> <449C78E9.6010608@sbcglobal.net>
<449FDD81.8050505@sun.com>

Rick Hillegas wrote:
> Hi Kathey,
>
> Right now, I'm planning to back out BOOLEAN before the branch.

Hi Rick,

Does this mean the work already done for adding the BOOLEAN-type is not
appropriate for completion in 10.3 (or a later release)?

In case the work already done is to be discarded, can the reason(s)
behind this decision be (briefly) stated?




Thanks,
-- 
Kristian

>
> Regards,
> -Rick
>
> Kathey Marsden wrote:
>
>> Rick Hillegas wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>> Like you I'm happy that Geir Magnusson is working the JCP issues and
>>> I'm optimistic that the time line, which had been twisted into a
>>> pretzel, can be straightened out. I'm not ready to propose an
>>> alternative--but I expect to know more soon. Something along the
>>> lines of your proposal would be very attractive.
>>>
>>> I'm glad that you're comfortable with cutting a branch in early
>>> August. Perhaps we could move the discussion forward to this topic
>>> now. I know that several contributors still want to complete work on
>>> features for 10.2. Does everyone feel comfortable with having those
>>> features committed by August 10 so that we can cut a 10.2 branch then?
>>
>>
>> For BOOLEAN  do you still plan back out that work right after the branch?
>> Relevant issues:
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1029
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-984
>>
>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message