db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Andrew McIntyre wrote:

> 
> For violating the JSPA or the spec evaluation agreement as far as
> creating/distributing an implementation, which is where people got the
> idea that we couldn't publish a GA version of Derby that had JDBC 4.0
> bits in it. Although it appears we've now determined that Derby has no
> obligations with regard to these agreements as to when it can do a
> release.

I must have missed that, when was that detemrined?

Dan.