db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel John Debrunner <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: catch-22: Derby, Mustang, and JCP issue
Date Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:23:20 GMT
Jean T. Anderson wrote:

> Andreas Korneliussen wrote:

>>As for alpha/beta bits: they should not be set on a release candidate.
>>The vetted bits are the final bits if the community votes for the
>>release.  As far as I know, they were not set on the recently rejected
>>10.1.3 RC.

The 10.1 (in fact any) branch is always marked GA since its first
official release.

> Can Derby legally build an RC with the GA bits set before JDBC 4.0 is
> GA? --Understanding that the RC will be readily available to anyone to
> download?

and does the close of the successful vote mark the change to GA? Seems
it's the only logical point, the announce and distribution via the
mirrors are just action items after the GA decision is made.


View raw message