db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rick Hillegas <Richard.Hille...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-1271) Release documentation for JDBC4 release
Date Thu, 22 Jun 2006 18:48:01 GMT
+1

Regards,
-Rick

Jean T. Anderson wrote:

>Jeff Levitt wrote:
><snip>
>
>  
>
>>As the person who contributed the DITA-converted
>>documentation, I can tell you I didn't bump the
>>edition up based on that.  I believe the pre-DITA
>>documentation already said Second Edition.  
>>    
>>
>
>The pre-DITA (10.0) doc source says First Edition:
>
>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/db/derby/docs/branches/10.0/src/documentation/content/xdocs/manuals/getstart/gspr.ihtml
>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/db/derby/docs/branches/10.0/src/documentation/content/xdocs/manuals/reference/sqlj.ihtml
>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/db/derby/docs/branches/10.0/src/documentation/content/xdocs/manuals/develop/develop.ihtml
>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/db/derby/docs/branches/10.0/src/documentation/content/xdocs/manuals/tools/tools.ihtml
>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/db/derby/docs/branches/10.0/src/documentation/content/xdocs/manuals/admin/hubprnt.ihtml
>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/db/derby/docs/branches/10.0/src/documentation/content/xdocs/manuals/tuning/perf.ihtml
>
>  
>
>>The thought is that major releases (10.0, 10.1, 10.2)
>>are First Editions, and subsequent fixpaks are Second,
>>Third, Fourth editions etc., like 10.1.3 would be.  In
>>any case, we haven't adhered to any kind of
>>consistency on this with the guides, so I agree that
>>we need to define what we feel is an "edition" and
>>stick with it or remove it alltogether (although
>>perhaps there's a legal reason to keep it?)
>>    
>>
>
>If we don't have a specific use for it, I recommend removing it. I don't
>know of any legal reason to have it.
>  
>
> -jean
>  
>


Mime
View raw message