db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel John Debrunner <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [PRE-VOTE DISCUSSION] Compatibility rules and interface table
Date Wed, 21 Jun 2006 21:30:25 GMT
David Van Couvering wrote:
> Good news Lance, thanks, I was getting worried if we were going to have
> to regularly change column order and break existing applications/IDEs/etc.

Hopefully we don't have any documented Derby specific additional columns
in the metadata, that would be non-standard.

Dan.

> 
> David
> 
> Lance J. Andersen wrote:
> 
>> hi guys
>>
>> Rick Hillegas wrote:
>>
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> I had a couple more comments on the compatibility commitments.
>>> Cheers-Rick
>>>
>>>  - Changes to stored procedures: We will have to change column order if
>>>   we add Derby-specific columns to a metadata ResultSet and then a later
>>>   JDBC also adds more columns.
>>
>> Any vendor specific columns added should only be accessed via column
>> name and you should document that.
>>
>> we did clarify this in the JDBC spec
> 
> 



Mime
View raw message