Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Message-ID: <3389595.1149092432011.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 16:20:32 +0000 (GMT+00:00)
From: "Tomohito Nakayama (JIRA)" <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-1302) Indent source files touched in
 DERBY-326
In-Reply-To: <15829446.1147102940892.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1302?page=comments#action_12414081 ] 

Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-1302:
------------------------------------------

There seems to exist subject  of treatment for tab ...

1) 
Should it be untabfied ?
2) 
If it should be untabfied, what number is best for tab width ?
Tab width=8 is just a configuration in my development environment...

I did'nt think this configuration in untabfy was problem, 
because I have seen tab in source code with this configuration and 
have been familiared.

I think best configuration would be different according to person ...

> Indent source files touched in DERBY-326
> ----------------------------------------
>
>          Key: DERBY-1302
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1302
>      Project: Derby
>         Type: Sub-task

>     Reporter: Tomohito Nakayama
>     Assignee: Tomohito Nakayama
>  Attachments: DDMWriter.java, DERBY-1302.patch, DERBY-1302_2.patch, DERBY-1302_rollback.patch
>
> Through DERBY-326,some of source code was found not to be orderly indented.
> In this task, these files are to be orderly indented.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira