Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 2428 invoked from network); 9 May 2006 17:12:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 May 2006 17:12:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 9174 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2006 17:12:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 9090 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2006 17:12:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 9081 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2006 17:12:48 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 May 2006 10:12:48 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [209.237.227.198] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (209.237.227.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 May 2006 10:12:47 -0700 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99DD67142D8 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:12:05 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <19939495.1147194725627.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 17:12:05 +0000 (GMT+00:00) From: "Satheesh Bandaram (JIRA)" To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-1288) Bring Derby into JDBC compliance by supporting executeQuery() on escaped procedure invocations In-Reply-To: <4040143.1146759916992.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1288?page=comments#action_12378659 ] Satheesh Bandaram commented on DERBY-1288: ------------------------------------------ Knut wrote: > What Derby currently does, is > > executeQuery: > > fails whenever a stored procedure is invoked (both embedded and > client) Is that true? According to DERBY-501, executeQuery works for single ResultSet stored procedure for client, but fails for embedded. Since Rick agreed that fixing this would also fix DERBY-501, one of these should be marked a duplicate. > Bring Derby into JDBC compliance by supporting executeQuery() on escaped procedure invocations > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DERBY-1288 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1288 > Project: Derby > Type: Improvement > Components: JDBC > Versions: 10.2.0.0 > Reporter: Rick Hillegas > Assignee: Knut Anders Hatlen > Fix For: 10.2.0.0 > > The following statement raises an error in Derby: > statement.executeQuery( "{call foo()}" ); > although this statement works: > statement.executeUpdate( "{call foo()}" ); > According to section 6.4 of the latest draft of the JDBC4 Compliance chapter, both statements are supposed to work in order to claim Java EE JDBC Compliance. > We need to bring Derby into compliance by supporting executeQuery() on escaped procedure invocations. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira