db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Van Couvering <David.Vancouver...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-1302) Indent source files touched in DERBY-326
Date Wed, 31 May 2006 17:05:19 GMT
I thought we had a general agreement of tabstop=4, not 8.  That's what 
I"m working with and in general it works pretty well in Derby code.

David

Tomohito Nakayama (JIRA) wrote:
>     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1302?page=comments#action_12414081 ]

> 
> Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-1302:
> ------------------------------------------
> 
> There seems to exist subject  of treatment for tab ...
> 
> 1) 
> Should it be untabfied ?
> 2) 
> If it should be untabfied, what number is best for tab width ?
> Tab width=8 is just a configuration in my development environment...
> 
> I did'nt think this configuration in untabfy was problem, 
> because I have seen tab in source code with this configuration and 
> have been familiared.
> 
> I think best configuration would be different according to person ...
> 
>> Indent source files touched in DERBY-326
>> ----------------------------------------
>>
>>          Key: DERBY-1302
>>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1302
>>      Project: Derby
>>         Type: Sub-task
> 
>>     Reporter: Tomohito Nakayama
>>     Assignee: Tomohito Nakayama
>>  Attachments: DDMWriter.java, DERBY-1302.patch, DERBY-1302_2.patch, DERBY-1302_rollback.patch
>>
>> Through DERBY-326,some of source code was found not to be orderly indented.
>> In this task, these files are to be orderly indented.
> 

Mime
View raw message