db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Matrigali <mikem_...@sbcglobal.net>
Subject Re: New "segmented" StorageFactory Development
Date Fri, 05 May 2006 21:36:10 GMT
I agree.  They are definitely two different areas in the
current implementation.  I'll file a JIRA with the disk
quota, with some initial observations about the current system.
Note, anyone interested in working on it should the join
the discussion, at the present I don't plan on implementing.

Rodrigo Madera wrote:
> Good idea!
> On 5/5/06, Bryan Pendleton <bpendleton@amberpoint.com> wrote:
>> It seems to me that there may be two different features
>> being discussed here:
>> 1) Allowing more than one segment for data storage.
>> 2) Establishing a disk "quota" on a segment, so that Derby
>>     will limit its space usage to no more than its quota.
>> It strikes me that it might be useful to implement these
>> features independently, as each seems like it could be
>> potentially useful without the other, and then both could
>> be profitably used together.
>> thanks,
>> bryan

View raw message