db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kathey Marsden <kmarsdende...@sbcglobal.net>
Subject Re: What does deprecation mean for JDBC? (Was Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-1283) Fill in a deprecated but mandatory JDBC3 method: PreparedStatement.setUnicodeStream())
Date Thu, 04 May 2006 17:25:03 GMT
Rick Hillegas wrote:

> Lance J. Andersen wrote:
> ...
>
>>
>> If you want to ask the question a different way and revisit whether 
>> setUniCodeStream can be considered optional, then do so please and i 
>> will consider it and have that discussion with the EG.  JDBC drivers 
>> that have been around since the early days implemented this method.
>>
>
> I think this would be a useful discussion to have with the EG. It 
> would be great if deprecation made a method optional even though the 
> method remained in the api.
>
I agree that it would be a good discussion to have and honestly I don't 
have a strong opinion one way or another about how it should be.  I  do 
think that regardless of whether deprecation makes a method  optional or 
not, it would be really good to have clear wording somewhere saying that 
it does or does not.  I am guessing there are folks that are just as  in 
the dark as I have been that  "deprecated but mandatory"  methods  exist.

Kathey





Mime
View raw message