db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Rick Hillegas (JIRA)" <derby-...@db.apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (DERBY-1288) Bring Derby into JDBC compliance by supporting executeQuery() on escaped procedure invocations
Date Thu, 04 May 2006 17:04:18 GMT
    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1288?page=comments#action_12377845 ] 

Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1288:
--------------------------------------

Lance says:

"Just to be clear, this requirement has been part of the J2EE specification since 1999.  It
is not new.

JDBC 4 is migrating the section from the J2EE spec WRT J2EE jdbc requirements to the JDBC
spec and future Java EE specs will refer to this chapter for requirements."

> Bring Derby into JDBC compliance by supporting executeQuery() on escaped procedure invocations
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: DERBY-1288
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1288
>      Project: Derby
>         Type: Improvement

>   Components: JDBC
>     Versions: 10.2.0.0
>     Reporter: Rick Hillegas
>      Fix For: 10.2.0.0

>
> The following statement raises an error in Derby:
>   statement.executeQuery( "{call foo()}" );
> although this statement works:
>   statement.executeUpdate( "{call foo()}" );
> According to section 6.4 of the latest draft of the JDBC4 Compliance chapter, both statements
are supposed to work in order to claim Java EE JDBC Compliance.
> We need to bring Derby into compliance by supporting executeQuery() on escaped procedure
invocations.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Mime
View raw message