Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 14:45:01 +0200
From: Knut Anders Hatlen <Knut.Hatlen@Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: Disussion surrounding holding off metadata changes until certain
 issues resolved
In-reply-to: <4431A363.8030703@sbcglobal.net>
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Message-id: <wjo8y7ylik6q.fsf@sun.com>
Organization: Sun Microsystems
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/22.0.50 (usg-unix-v)
References: <1733524392.1143644387310.JavaMail.jira@ajax>
 <442AC280.6020709@sun.com> <87zmj9kqsb.fsf@sun.com>
 <442AED77.3040902@Sourcery.Org> <wjo8odzo6pq5.fsf@sun.com>
 <aae143430604011153o2ff96362g47347ba3822b0129@mail.gmail.com>
 <44315CBC.7090604@sun.com> <44316351.6070503@Sourcery.Org>
 <443184EF.9000500@sbcglobal.net> <44318F67.4070806@Sourcery.Org>
 <44319AEE.1060303@sbcglobal.net> <4431A1FC.30606@sun.com>
 <4431A363.8030703@sbcglobal.net>

Kathey Marsden <kmarsdenderby@sbcglobal.net> writes:

> Rick Hillegas wrote:
>
>> So, I'm unclear: Are you still blocking metadata changes or are you
>> satisfied with the analysis done so far by Knut Anders and Dyre? Can
>> we proceed with metadata checkins provided that:
>>
>> 1) Such patches clearly describe acceptable upgrade behavior
>> 2) Clean upgrade test results accompany the submissions
>>
> I think that this would be fine and in addition would hope that any
> metadata queries changed/added  were  covered as part of the ugprade test.

I think it would be good if the upgrade test also ran metadata tests
in the DerbyNetClient framework. The only known upgrade issue in 10.2
is DERBY-1176, but it is not exposed by the upgrade test since it is
only seen in client/server mode.

-- 
Knut Anders