Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 68450 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2006 16:51:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Apr 2006 16:51:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 89017 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2006 16:51:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 88980 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2006 16:51:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 88971 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2006 16:51:08 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:51:08 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of mcintyre.a@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.189] (HELO nproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.182.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:51:07 -0700 Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q29so1247548nfc for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:50:46 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=iYD63oOu2bVIiHpKxbL8ircA3GUUbiPGFScU/0vCdY7vsJNvYfGpMGWc5y/CCQ5+/ClCH1sqRUD40Vndo9OZGeUDBZNSHc2YLRHjzyfkL7yK0GgD6p8EPp02FFrgMeP+WWckmNwTrxKGTPNe0+TegkrUBUQABPiBBz9rRaATsXw= Received: by 10.49.75.5 with SMTP id c5mr649536nfl; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:50:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.14.15 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:50:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54ac72d70604260950t6cc466a0lea2a4003022af82@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:50:45 -0700 From: "Andrew McIntyre" To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: Re: 10.2 release in August? In-Reply-To: <444F9650.8070809@amberpoint.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <444F87DC.9090906@apache.org> <444F9650.8070809@amberpoint.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 4/26/06, Bryan Pendleton wrote: > > If the JDK 1.6 and JDBC 4.0 schedules should slip further, for example > into 2007, it would be a shame to have our hands tied and be unable to > ship any sort of a 10.2 release until then. +1. It's the closeness of what I think the two proposed schedules are. If the later release moved out to December or later then I'd have time to help with both those releases. As Jean pointed out, my negative vote is simply a measure of my support. They're free to have an earlier release in July: it's just that I know I won't have a whole lot of time to help with testing and review and such, since I'm still planning on doing the 10.1.3 maintenance release that would wrap up in late June. Ah, if only the release dates for big, complicated projects like the JDK were concrete and never moved and we knew when JDBC 4.0 would be finalized. ;;-D andrew