db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrew McIntyre" <mcintyr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [jira] Assigned: (DERBY-1079) Build javadoc under jdk 1.6
Date Wed, 12 Apr 2006 18:16:20 GMT
On 4/12/06, Rick Hillegas <Richard.Hillegas@sun.com> wrote:
>
> o Use the jdk16 javadoc if ant.properties points to a 1.6 installation

Yep, I think that's what I was suggesting. :-)

> o Don't exclude the jdbc40 classes from the javadoc at all. If
> ant.properties doesn't point at a 1.6 intallation, then they won't be
> built anyway.

Now we're talking about the engine docs, not the publishedapi javadoc
that ships in the release.

For the engine docs, I'd suggest a similar setup. If you don't exclude
the jdbc40 classes, I'm pretty sure that javadoc will still find them
in the source and complain if it can't find the corresponding compiled
classfile.

andrew

Mime
View raw message