db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sunitha Kambhampati <ksunitha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-900) Remove use of String(byte[]) and String(byte[], int, int) constructors in network client leading to non-portable behaviour
Date Tue, 18 Apr 2006 19:04:18 GMT
Oystein Grovlen - Sun Norway wrote:

> Due to its high failure rate, ConcurrentImplicitCreateSchema was 
> removed from derbyall in February.  The check-in of this patch has 
> added it back in the encodingTests suite. Why?  It is not part of the 
> patch uploaded on JIRA, and I cannot see any relations between this 
> test and the topic of this patch nor to encodingTests.
>
> This has resulted in failures in the nightly tests and the tinderbox 
> tests.
>
Thanks for pointing this out, Oystein.  

The derby900 fix , also fixes the issue described in derby583.  Both are 
encoding related issues. The ConcurrentImplicitCreateSchema test was 
used as the repro in derby583 and so I added this test to 
encodingTests.   But I dont need this entire test to reproduce the 
problem, just needed an error message.

This test (as part of encodingTests suite)  passed in my environment 
using the 1.5 vm and I didnt realize that this test was disabled on 
trunk (10.2 codeline). Sorry for the trouble.  encodingTests suite is 
only in trunk and hence this test was added to that suite only, as part 
of patch (derby900.p1.diff.txt) for trunk, which is on jira.   I assume 
you looked at the 10.1 patch attached to the jira and hence didnt find 
it there.

I have attached a patch (derby900.test.diff.txt) to derby900 to remove 
ConcurrentImplicitCreateSchema test from encodingTests suite and instead 
have a new simple test (TestEnc.java) for encoding issues to avoid any 
other confusion.

Thanks,
Sunitha.

Mime
View raw message